net that you can see the difference in frames per second recorded: 30 fps for the 2D version, from 24 to about 28 fps for the version in 3D graphics. Whilst it is accepted that the differences are very subtle, what do you think?
Video:
Friday, March 11, 2011
Facial Skin Conditions More Condition_symptoms
Killzone 3: 2D vs 3D video analysis
Killzone 3 back to appear in video and makes an interesting comparison between 2D and 3D technique. The most
net that you can see the difference in frames per second recorded: 30 fps for the 2D version, from 24 to about 28 fps for the version in 3D graphics. Whilst it is accepted that the differences are very subtle, what do you think?
Video:
net that you can see the difference in frames per second recorded: 30 fps for the 2D version, from 24 to about 28 fps for the version in 3D graphics. Whilst it is accepted that the differences are very subtle, what do you think?
Video:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment